Purpose and Objective
•
Substitute for live classes
◦
Discuss areas actually taught in class because students have troubles with
◦
NOT generic informative guide notes
◦
Complemented by offline feedback/editing (+ 30 mins topic confirmation meeting)
•
Boost scoring potential with targeted advice
•
Command-Based Language to mirror the teacher’s voice
◦
Directive, confident tone, echoing a teacher’s instructional style.
◦
E.g. “Choose the easiest high-scoring topic instead of the topic of your interest.”
Structure
Touches on every assessment criteria but also include
•
Topic Choice (Most important)
◦
Exemplar topics per subunit
◦
Selectively recommend high-scoring subunits and topics
•
Proposal
◦
Explain common reasons for proposal rejections, especially vagueness and insufficient analytic points
◦
Provide strategies for avoiding these pitfalls with concrete examples.
◦
Example of rejected proposal and how modifications can be made to be ‘approved’
•
Analysis
◦
(Maths) Research Data
◦
(Sciences) Experimental Data
◦
(English) Extract
◦
(Economics) Article
◦
Highlight overlooked details and critical analysis.
•
Examples of Key Challenges and Pitfalls
◦
Use sections of sample IAs provided by the company or previous students' work to illustrate areas that need improvement, emphasizing revision tactics.
Procedure
•
Reference
◦
Find and use a reference note as initial framework/outline
◦
If none suitable, create one using ChatGPT
•
Restructure & Paraphrase
◦
Add meat to the initial framework to ensure contents resonate the teacher’s own voice
•
Design
◦
A professional designer will ensure the final presentation is visually polished so that teachers can focus entirely on content.