What is the Maths IA?
The Maths Internal Assessment (IA) is an individual mathematical exploration that forms 20% of the final IB Maths grade. It is a 12–20-page written report (excluding bibliography), where the student investigates a mathematical topic of personal interest.
•
Time allocation: Students are recommended to spend 10–15 hours on the IA.
•
Content includes: Mathematical modeling, data analysis, theoretical proofs, or applications of mathematical concepts.
•
Format: Double-spaced, containing explanations, graphs, tables, charts, and appendices.
1. Purpose and Significance of the IA
The IA is more than a writing task—it's a personalized exploration that allows students to:
•
Apply mathematical knowledge outside exam constraints.
•
Experience real-world applications and personal interests through math.
•
Appreciate the beauty, power, and utility of mathematics.
•
Develop skills in independent inquiry, problem-solving, and reflection.
•
Demonstrate how technology supports mathematical investigation.
Key Takeaway: The IA encourages students to ask their own questions and pursue them using math, shifting from solving textbook problems to creating meaningful explorations.
2. IA Evaluation Criteria (Total: 20 Marks)
Criterion A - Presentation (4)
✓ Clarity
✓ Structure
✓ Coherence of the report | Coherent: Logical flow from start to conclusion; avoids tangents.
Well-organized: Visuals like graphs, formulas, and tables are integrated into the main body at relevant points (not just placed in appendices).
Concise: Avoids repetition and unnecessary content. |
Criterion B - Mathematical Communication (4)
✓ Clear and accurate use of mathematical language and notation | Define key terms, symbols, and variables explicitly.
Avoid calculator-specific notation (like asterisks or “√”).
Use equation editors in Word or LaTeX for professional formatting.
Ensure graphs and figures are labeled and referenced correctly. |
Criterion C - Personal Engagement (3)
✓ Originality
✓ Relevance
✓ Authenticity of the student’s approach | Demonstrate genuine interest and personal connection to the topic.
Show independent thinking through creative approaches or contextual relevance.
Avoid generic or superficial claims of interest; instead, explain your motivation authentically. |
Criterion D - Reflection (3)
✓ Depth of analysis
✓ Critical thinking | Reflect on what you learned, what worked well, and what could be improved.
Consider alternative approaches or limitations of your methods.
Think about the broader implications of your results. |
Criterion E - Use of Mathematics (6)
✓ Mathematical depth
✓ Sophistication
✓ Understanding | Choose a topic that matches the breadth and depth of your course level (SL vs. HL).
Demonstrate understanding by explaining your methods, not just performing calculations.
Use relevant and appropriate mathematics (avoid trivial or oversimplified content). |
3. Role of the School Teacher
Teachers are mentors, not co-authors. According to IB guidelines:
•
They may suggest ideas, provide feedback, and flag errors.
•
They cannot correct or rewrite any part of the student’s work.
•
They may ask probing questions to deepen your thinking or challenge your assumptions.
•
They help ensure the IA is the student’s authentic work.
Key Student Responsibilities:
•
Take initiative: Drive the project and make decisions.
•
Be independent: Consult multiple sources and develop your own reasoning.
Stay
resourceful
: Use available tools and guidance wisely.
Differences Between AA and AI, and SL vs HL
1. Course Objectives & Academic Expectations
The IB Maths IA is assessed using the same rubric for all students — whether they’re taking Maths: Analysis and Approaches (AA) or Maths: Applications and Interpretation (AI) at Standard Level (SL) or Higher Level (HL). However, the course objectives shape the style, approach, and often the type of topic students feel comfortable exploring.
AA – Analysis and Approaches | AI – Applications and Interpretation |
Focuses on theoretical math, including:
• Algebra, functions, trigonometry, calculus, and proofs. | Focuses on applied math with:
• Data analysis, modeling, technology, and statistics |
Emphasizes:
• Logical reasoning
• Abstract thinking
• Conjecturing and mathematical proof | Emphasizes:
• Real-world problem-solving
• Mathematical modeling
• Use of technology (spreadsheets, simulations, graphing calculators) |
Proof-heavy, abstract reasoning | Real-world applications and modeling |
2. Differences Between AA and AI Students in the IA
Key Insight: There are no IA topics exclusive to either AA or AI.
The same standards and assessment criteria apply to both courses.
That said, students naturally gravitate toward topics aligned with their course strengths:
AA Tendencies | AI Tendencies |
Theoretical and abstract exploration | Data-driven, practical applications |
Algebraic derivations and analytical models | Simulations, spreadsheet modeling |
Conjectures, formulas, and logical proofs | Real-world scenarios and modeling |
Less technology-dependent | Heavy use of technology and computation tools |
Remember: A high-scoring IA in AA can also score highly in AI and vice versa. Your mathematical depth, clarity, and engagement matter more than the course label.
Examples:
•
AA: Exploring convergence of infinite series, proving identities, optimizing functions analytically.
•
AI: Modeling population growth with logistic equations, analyzing social media trends with regression, simulating traffic flow.
3. SL vs HL Expectations – A Deeper Dive into Criterion E
Criterion E (Use of Mathematics) is where the expectations differ most clearly between Standard Level (SL) and Higher Level (HL) students.
SL | HL |
KISS Principle – Keep It Simple, SL | Precision, Sophistication, and Rigor |
Thorough understanding of a single topic is enough. | Select more complex or challenging topics, ideally from HL content or beyond. |
No need to go beyond syllabus content. | Show mathematical sophistication
• Linking multiple concepts.
• Using advanced problem-solving techniques.
• Conducting deeper analysis or derivations. |
Simpler models and computations are acceptable if well explained. | Maintain rigor in logic and justification:
• Every claim must be backed with mathematical reasoning.
• Arguments should be clear, error-free, and well-structured. |
HL IA Strategy:
•
Choose a challenging, layered topic.
•
Make interdisciplinary connections where possible (e.g., physics, economics, coding).
•
Highlight your ability to reason, prove, and model at a high level.
Aspect | SL | HL |
Topic Complexity | Moderate; syllabus-aligned | High; ideally HL-level or beyond |
Depth of Math | Thorough explanation | Thorough + sophisticated techniques |
Technology Use | Recommended | Expected and integrated strategically |
Proofs & Derivations | Optional | Expected (especially in AA HL) |
Inter-topic Links | Helpful | Strongly encouraged |
Developing a Research Question
Once you’ve chosen a topic, crafting a precise and focused research question (RQ) is critical to the success of your Math IA. The RQ serves as the guiding statement for your exploration, ensuring clarity, direction, and alignment with the IA criteria.
Why Is the Research Question Important?
A well-crafted RQ:
•
Establishes the purpose and scope of your IA.
•
Ensures a clear mathematical focus.
•
Guides the analysis and structure of your investigation.
Steps to Develop a Research Question
1. Understand Your Chosen Topic
Break your topic into its key components. Consider the real-world context and the mathematical concepts you aim to explore.
•
Example Topic: Modeling ITC Ltd.'s Stock Prices with Regression Analysis
◦
Real-World Context: Stock price prediction is vital for investors and businesses.
◦
Mathematical Concepts: Linear regression, polynomial regression, residual analysis, RMSE, R².
2. Define the Focus of Your Exploration
Ask yourself:
•
What am I trying to find out or prove?
•
Which mathematical tools will I use?
•
How will I measure the effectiveness of my analysis?
For the topic above:
•
Objective: Compare the accuracy of polynomial and linear regression models.
•
Focus: Assess model accuracy using RMSE and R² values.
3. Make It Specific and Measurable
A strong RQ avoids vagueness and defines measurable outcomes. Use terms that specify the scope and mathematical approach.
Weak Example:
•
“How can regression analysis be used to study ITC’s stock prices?”
(Too broad and lacks specificity.)
Improved Example:
•
“How accurately can polynomial regression model ITC Ltd.’s stock prices over a 10-year period, and how does it compare to linear regression?”
(Specific and highlights both the mathematical method and evaluation criteria.)
4. Ensure Mathematical Rigor
Choose an RQ that requires in-depth mathematical exploration rather than simple calculations.
•
Good Example:
◦
“Can polynomial regression predict ITC’s stock prices more accurately than linear regression, as measured by RMSE and R² values?”
(Involves multiple steps: applying two regression models, calculating residuals, and interpreting statistical accuracy.)
•
Poor Example:
◦
“What is the average trend of ITC’s stock prices over 10 years?”
(Descriptive, lacks analysis and mathematical complexity.)
5. Keep It Realistic
The RQ should match the time and resources available. Avoid overly ambitious questions that require advanced mathematics or inaccessible data.
•
Example of Overambition:
◦
“How can machine learning algorithms predict ITC’s stock prices with 95% accuracy?”
(Unrealistic for an IA due to complexity and scope.)
•
Refined Alternative:
◦
“How accurately can a quadratic regression model predict ITC’s stock prices compared to a linear regression model?”
6. Align with IB Criteria
The RQ should connect to the IB Math syllabus and demonstrate criteria such as personal engagement, mathematical communication, and reflection.
Template for Developing Research Questions
1.
Start with the mathematical method:
•
“How effectively can [mathematical method] be used to model [real-world phenomenon]?”
2.
Add a comparative or evaluative element:
•
“How does [Method A] compare to [Method B] in modeling [phenomenon]?”
3.
Specify evaluation criteria:
•
“…as measured by [specific metrics].”
Example RQ Templates:
•
“How accurately can polynomial regression predict/model [real-world phenomenon] compared to linear regression?”
•
“What is the optimal degree of a polynomial function for modeling [phenomenon] as measured by [metric]?”
•
“How does the predictive accuracy of [mathematical model] change when applied to [data subsets]?”
Examples for ITC Stock Prices Topic
1.
Basic:
•
“How accurately can polynomial regression model ITC Ltd.’s stock prices over the past decade?”
2.
Comparative:
•
“How does the accuracy of polynomial regression compare to linear regression in modeling ITC’s stock prices?”
3.
Optimization Focus:
•
“What is the optimal degree of a polynomial function for predicting ITC’s stock prices, and how does this compare to a linear model?”
4.
Advanced:
•
“How do varying data sample sizes impact the accuracy of polynomial regression in modeling ITC’s stock prices?”
Writing a Clear and Focused Proposal
A strong proposal clearly articulates the topic, scope, and mathematical tools while demonstrating analytical depth. Here's a framework for crafting one:
1.
Title:
•
Be concise yet descriptive.
Example: "Using Polynomial Regression to Model and Predict ITC Ltd.'s Stock Prices."
2.
Rationale and Research Question:
•
Explain why the topic is interesting or relevant.
•
Define the research question in a way that highlights the mathematical focus.
Example: "Can polynomial regression provide an accurate model for ITC’s stock price trends over the past decade, and how does its accuracy compare to linear regression?"
3.
Scope and Objectives:
•
Specify the mathematical methods you will use (e.g., regression analysis, RMSE evaluation).
•
Indicate the expected outcome (e.g., insights into the accuracy of different models).
4.
Data and Resources:
•
Mention the data source and how it will be used.
Example: "Daily closing prices of ITC Ltd. from the past 10 years obtained from the NSE database."
5.
Anticipated Challenges:
•
Acknowledge possible difficulties and how you plan to address them.
Example: "Handling missing data points using interpolation techniques."
Strategies to Include Analytical Depth
1.
Focus on Mathematical Rigor:
•
Clearly state which mathematical techniques will be applied.
Example: "The analysis will involve deriving polynomial regression equations, calculating residuals, and evaluating model accuracy using RMSE."
2.
Ensure Relevance of Analysis:
•
Tie the analysis back to the research question.
Example: "By comparing RMSE values, I will determine which regression model better captures ITC’s stock trends."
3.
Incorporate Multiple Perspectives:
•
Use comparative analysis (e.g., linear vs. polynomial regression) to provide depth.
•
Visualize the data with graphs to support conclusions.
4.
Reflect on Limitations:
•
Discuss potential shortcomings of the model or data, adding nuance to the analysis.
Example of a Rejected Proposal and Its Revision
Rejected Proposal:
•
Title: "Analyzing ITC's Stock Prices"
•
Reason for Rejection:
◦
The topic is vague, lacks a clear objective, and does not specify mathematical tools.
Revised Proposal:
•
Title: "Modeling and Predicting ITC’s Stock Prices Using Regression Analysis"
•
Rationale and Research Question:
◦
"Accurately predicting stock price movements can provide valuable market behavior insights for investors. This IA aims to answer: How accurately can polynomial regression model ITC’s stock prices, and how does it compare to linear regression in terms of predictive accuracy?"
•
Scope and Objectives:
◦
"This project will involve:
▪
Collecting daily closing prices of ITC from the NSE.
▪
Applying linear and polynomial regression to the data.
▪
Evaluating the models using RMSE and R² values."*
•
Data and Resources:
◦
"Data will be sourced from NSE’s official website. Graphing tools like Desmos and software such as Excel or Python will be used for analysis."
•
Anticipated Challenges:
◦
"Ensuring data reliability and managing computational errors during regression analysis."
This revised proposal is clear, focused, and demonstrates analytical depth, making it much more likely to be approved.
Structuring Your IB Math IA
A well-structured IA is crucial for presenting your work effectively and meeting IB’s assessment criteria. Below is a draft for structuring the key sections of your IB Math IA, along with tips for incorporating feedback and enhancing clarity and conciseness.
1. Introduction
The introduction should set the stage for your exploration by briefly explaining your topic, its relevance, and the mathematical focus.
Key Components:
•
Topic Overview:
◦
Provide a clear and concise description of your topic.
Example: "This IA investigates the use of polynomial regression to model and predict ITC Ltd.’s stock prices, a subject of great interest due to its implications in finance and decision-making."
•
Real-World Connection:
◦
Highlight the significance of the topic in a real-world context.
Example: "Understanding stock price trends is vital for investors, and mathematical models can provide insights into market behavior."
•
Research Question:
◦
Clearly state the research question to guide the exploration.
Example: "How accurately can polynomial regression model ITC’s stock prices compared to linear regression?"
•
Brief Outline:
◦
Mention the methods and structure of your IA.
Example: "This paper explores regression models, evaluates their accuracy using RMSE, and discusses the models’ limitations."
2. Rationale and Aim
This section explains why you chose the topic and what you aim to achieve.
Key Components:
•
Why This Topic?
◦
Provide a personal or academic rationale.
Example: "I chose this topic because it combines my interest in finance with my understanding of regression analysis, allowing me to explore a real-world application of mathematics."
•
Aims and Objectives:
◦
Clearly articulate the goals of your exploration.
Example: "The aim is to determine which regression model offers a more accurate prediction of ITC’s stock prices over a specified period."
Tip: Use feedback from offline sessions to refine this section, ensuring the rationale and aim align with the scope of your mathematical exploration.
3. Methodology
This section outlines the processes, mathematical tools, and techniques you used in your IA.
Key Components:
•
Data Collection:
◦
Describe the source and relevance of your data.
Example: "Daily closing stock prices of ITC Ltd. were collected from the NSE website, covering the past 10 years."
•
Mathematical Methods:
◦
Explain the specific methods used in your analysis.
Example: "Polynomial regression equations were derived and compared to linear regression models to assess accuracy."
•
Tools and Software:
◦
Mention any software or tools used.
Example: "Data analysis was conducted using Python, with libraries such as NumPy and Matplotlib for regression modeling and visualization."
Tip: Incorporate feedback to ensure the methodology is detailed enough to demonstrate rigor while avoiding unnecessary complexity.
4. Analysis
This is the core of your IA, where you present and interpret your mathematical exploration.
Key Components:
•
Mathematical Processes:
◦
Clearly explain the steps taken in your analysis.
Example: "The regression models were generated by minimizing the sum of squared residuals, and their performance was assessed using RMSE and R² values."
•
Visualization:
◦
Include graphs and tables to illustrate your findings.
Example: A scatterplot showing ITC’s stock prices overlaid with polynomial and linear regression curves.
•
Interpretation:
◦
Discuss the implications of your results.
Example: "The polynomial regression model had a lower RMSE, suggesting a better fit compared to the linear model."
Tip: Use concise language to explain your processes and results. Feedback can help identify areas where additional explanation or simplification is needed.
5. Evaluation
This section reflects on the accuracy, limitations, and real-world implications of your findings.
Key Components:
•
Accuracy Testing:
◦
Evaluate the precision of your models.
Example: "While the polynomial regression model had a lower RMSE, it exhibited signs of overfitting for larger datasets."
•
Limitations:
◦
Discuss challenges or limitations encountered.
Example: "The analysis is limited by the assumption that past stock trends predict future performance, which may not always hold true."
•
Further Research:
◦
Suggest areas for further exploration.
Example: "Future studies could incorporate more advanced regression techniques, such as exponential smoothing, for improved predictions."
Tip: Incorporate feedback to ensure your evaluation addresses all relevant criteria and considers alternative interpretations.
6. Conclusion
Summarize your findings and their significance in a concise manner.
Key Components:
•
Restate Findings:
◦
Summarize the key results.
Example: "The polynomial regression model provided a more accurate fit for ITC’s stock prices than the linear model, as evidenced by lower RMSE values."
•
Answer the Research Question:
◦
Directly address the research question posed in the introduction.
•
Final Reflection:
◦
Conclude with the broader relevance of your findings.
Example: "This analysis demonstrates the practical application of regression models in financial decision-making."
Tip: Use feedback to ensure the conclusion is not overly repetitive and ties all sections together effectively.