Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
In "Angry Alan," Roger's monologue functions as a lens through which his character and circumstances are illuminated. With candor and introspection, Roger divulges intricate facets of his life and emotional landscape, all while maintaining an engaging, conversational cadence that effortlessly draws in the audience. His stream-of-consciousness delivery not only mimics the organic flow of human thought but also fosters a profound sense of empathy and connection. By using these devices, Skinner subtly intimates Roger's potential sense of overwhelm, enriching his portrayal with nuanced depth and authenticity.
Roger initiates with a modest anecdote of intending to embark on a run but ultimately succumbing to the allure of his phone, veering from one distraction to the next. Through this narrative thread, Skinner skillfully demonstrates Roger's relatability, portraying him as akin to us, perpetually ensnared by digital distractions and prone to forgetting his initial intentions. This universality resonates deeply, as Roger emerges as an archetype of the average individual grappling with the commonplace challenges of daily life. When Roger articulates, "eventually you realize time has sort of slipped away and it’s forty minutes later and you put your phone down and wonder what you were doing and remember you were going to go for a run but when you look outside it’s raining so why am I telling you that," Skinner crafts a moment of genuine authenticity, showcasing Roger's struggles with technology and distractions. By illuminating Roger's imperfections, she fosters a profound sense of empathy, allowing the audience to better comprehend and identify with his humanity. This deliberate portrayal transforms Roger from a mere theatrical construct into a fully realized individual, imbued with complexity and depth. In this fashion, Skinner captures the banalities of everyday existence, presenting Roger as a genuine and multifaceted figure rather than reducing him to a simplistic stereotype.
A significant portion of Roger's dialogue revolves around contrasting his past self, "Roger-from-before," with his current persona, "Roger-Now." This aspect of the dialog makes effective use of juxtaposition, providing insight into his former and present circumstances. Skinner indicates, "Roger-from-before would be getting in his fancy car and heading into the office," suggesting a time of greater success and fulfillment. In contrast, "Roger-Now" holds the less prestigious role of third assistant store manager, primarily dealing with customer complaints, a task requiring considerable patience. Roger's remark, "I’m a guy you can yell at. Sometimes if you’re mad enough you can threaten me with physical violence," sheds light on the challenges he faces and the abuse he must tolerate. Additionally, Roger's resigned acceptance of his job, as evidenced by phrases like "I know better than to go up against store policy," suggests a reluctance to challenge his position. However, there's an underlying bitterness in his description of his role and the store's hierarchy. His seemingly cheerful declaration, "I’m happy to help," juxtaposed with his depiction of the mundane aspects of his job, underscores his deep-seated dissatisfaction.
What’s also worthy of note is how Roger reflects on Tim, the store manager, observing, “His name is Tim and he’s sitting up in his fancy glass office on the second floor. We actually went to high school together which is how I got this job.” Skinner illustrates Roger's dilemma; though he requires sustenance and remuneration, his pride wanes in the shadow of Tim, his former peer, who occupies the coveted position. The phrase “fancy glass office” serves to highlight this disparity that has rendered Roger powerless and exacerbated by his responsibility to address irate customers: “But I’ll just offer you a refund and tell you I’m very sorry and I hope you’ll continue to choose Safeway for all your shopping needs.” These interactions underscore Roger's inability to advocate for himself, laying bare the stark reality of his circumstances. In this regard, his suppressed desires for advancement and aversion to menial labor are palpable. Nevertheless, his resignation is palpable as he acknowledges the confines of his influence. Consequently, his indignation and vexation assume prominence within this narrative. Concluding with a rueful sentiment, “Where am I going with this? Oh right. I’m at the beginning. And it’s Monday morning,” he emphasizes his disillusionment and anticipates the arduous week ahead. This recurrent cycle of abuse elucidates Roger's embittered demeanor given how he grapples to preserve his dignity.
Roger's monologue in "Angry Alan" offers insight into his character. Through a conversational tone and relatable stories, Skinner portrays Roger as an embittered, distracted individual whose current situation stands in stark contrast to his past success. His scattered thoughts reflect his struggle with modern life's challenges, shedding light on his personal journey and resonating with those facing similar disillusionment and adaptation to new realities.
Criteria | Mark | Feedback |
A: Understanding &
Interpretation | 5 | The essay demonstrates a strong understanding of the themes and characters in "Angry Alan." The writer effectively interprets Roger's monologue as a means to illuminate his character and circumstances, highlighting his struggles with modern life's challenges and his sense of disillusionment. |
B: Analysis & Evaluation | 5 | The analysis provided is thorough and insightful. The writer delves into specific scenes and dialogue to extract meaning, such as Roger's contrast between his past and present selves and his interactions with other characters like Tim. The evaluation of Skinner's techniques in portraying Roger's complexity and relatability is well-supported and enhances the understanding of the text. |
C: Coherence, Focus, & Organization | 5 | The essay maintains a clear focus on analyzing Roger's monologue and its significance within the play. Each paragraph is well-structured, with coherent transitions between ideas. The writer effectively uses quotes and examples from the text to support their analysis, contributing to the overall clarity and organization of the essay. |
D: Language | 5 | The language used in the essay is sophisticated and appropriate for the analysis of a theatrical text. The writer demonstrates a strong command of vocabulary and effectively conveys their ideas with clarity and precision. |
20 / 20 |