home
Mission
///////
home
///////

Examples

Search
Guiding Question
Comment on how the interplay of text and images is used to appeal to multiple audiences.
Grade 5
Grade 6

Grade 7

The infographic, released by the UK government, aims to explain the crucial role of sustained physical activity in the developmental stages for children. Additionally, it provides recommendations of activities in hopes of encouraging more physical movement for young children. While the primary demographic targeted is evidently UK parents, the intended audience also encompasses daycare, preschool, and kindergarten educators, as well as children in the initial stages of literacy. By blending imagery and textual elements, the infographic simultaneously highlights lighthearted and didactic tones, thereby appealing to the sensibilities of novice parents and childcare providers. Simultaneously, the interplay of rudimentary stick figures, vibrant visuals, and straightforward diction facilitate engagement across a wide variety of age groups and levels of literacy proficiency.
The strategic blending of playful stick figure designs, color, and simple language proves highly effective in reaching out to the youngest target demographic of the text: children. Employing single-word imperatives like "builds,” “playground,” and “jump” accompanied by corresponding visual icons to assist understanding reduces the necessity for complex comprehension skills as children can contextually understand the intended actions solely through the presented information. Moreover, the overall pastel color scheme of the information establishes a both playful and non-intimidating atmosphere which can help children to subconsciously associate physical activity with the idea of fun and happiness. Hence, this fusion of visual and textual elements facilitates comprehension and implementation for young children, seamlessly aligning with the juvenile tone and spirit that resonates with audience.
On the other hand, when looking at the other elements and facets of the infographic, the writer caters more to the primary group of the text: mature and adult audience, particularly parents or guardians of young children. By highlighting six crucial components such as "relationships and social skills," "health and weight," and "brain development," and illustrating children with a smile within each building blocks, the author makes the information specifically relevant to the primary concerns of parents of children. Appealing to parents’ intrinsic desire to provide the most rich and supportive growing environment for their children, the succinct presentation of these components in bullet point format logically and emotionally associates physical activity with successful parenting. The ultimate persuasion to encourage physical activity is achieved with the imperative “aim for at least 180 minutes per day” with an intentional time unit of minutes instead of hours. By creating a false illusion that it is shorter in time, the information leverages these emotional connections and appeals to their sentiments while concurrently providing scientifically-backed information from a reputable medical source.
A nuanced aspect of the infographic lies in its blend of visual and textual elements, which subtly appeal to both rationality and emotion, effectively engaging not only parents but also preschool teachers and daycare caregivers. Given their significant interactions with young children, educators are a key audience addressed by certain features of the infographic. The characterization of active children as "healthy, happy, school-ready," coupled with the explicit mention of "playground," serves to implant a sense of responsibility within educators as well.  These terms carry positive connotations, urging teachers to proactively foster physical activity among their students. Furthermore, the infographic bolsters its credibility by referencing the authoritative "UK Chief Medical Officers’ Physical Activity Guidelines," lending weight to the information presented. By aligning with trusted professional institutions tasked with safeguarding children's well-being, the infographic instills confidence in the validity of its content among adults interacting with children. Additionally, the use of soft edges in the overall visual design subtly conveys a sense of safety, reminiscent of efforts to child-proof environments. This deliberate choice underscores the infographic's commitment to promoting child-friendly spaces, reassuring both parents and educators alike of the safety and reliability of the depicted activities. Overall, particular diction especially familiar to educators and soft shapes that characterize the design of the infographic enhance the infographic’s appeal to a wide range of adults.
Especially with the increasing inclination of parents to engage their children with technological devices in the 21st century, the infographic prompts the audience to consider the multiple advantages of physical activity for young children. To do so, the text utilizes an interplay of texts and images to educate and inspire the audience to implement these practical suggestions. Notably, the overall simplistic design and concision of language initially portrays the infographic as a casual text. However, deeper significance of its implications is successfully disseminated to multiple groups of audiences—especially parents and educators.
Text A
Guiding Question
Comment on how the interplay of text and images is used to appeal to multiple audiences.
Grade 5
Grade 6

Grade 7

The common stereotype that many associate with professionalism is graveness and austerity. However, in the case of "Humor At Work," an infographic by Humor That Works, the text factually yet humorously informs the readers that implementing humor in their professional lives will benefit them not only professionally but also physically and socially. Through the interplay of textual and visual components of the infographic, although the text targets a specific working demographic—predominantly older, college-educated American office workers who often find themselves entrenched in the monotony and formality of traditional 9-5 office settings—the text extends its message to both employers and employees including all races and genders.
In order to advocate for humor in the workplace, "Humor At Work" ingeniously integrates comedic elements throughout its infographic, ensuring that the readers not only grasp its concept but also experience its effects firsthand. One such example would be how the writers mention the different activities that burn equal calories to laughing: unconventional act of milking a cow for “15 minutes” (for office workers) humorously juxtaposed with more conventional forms of exercise like aerobic workouts and dancing. This drastic shift from the norm serves as a clever method to underscore the absurdity of the comparison, eliciting amusement from readers. Moreover, amidst the empirical statistics and health benefits, the creators again incorporates a note of levity through a clever visual pun: a milk carton bearing the phrase "Missing Hugh Moore". By using a typically seen American missing persons poster, it not only exaggerates the urgency of “finding” humor in workplaces but also leaves the readers perhaps with a slight smile on their face by the fictitious character "Hugh Moore”, a clever personification of humor itself. As a universally acknowledged positive emotion innately experienced by all human beings, the infographic brings out this forgotten emotional relief within workers with dreary routines.
Furthermore, the strategic incorporation of statistics throughout "Humor At Work" adds to an air of credibility, effectively appealing to the educated adults’ logos. With over 15 instances of empirical data used throughout its content, the infographic not only reinforces the shared experiences of office workers but also elucidates the multiple benefits of integrating humor into the workplace. The visual composition of this presentation is also effective as the decreasing percentage rates from “83%” to “55%” to “47%” from left to right reflects the natural way of reading a text. This placement thus immediately makes the emotion of “feel[ing] stressed” relatable to essentially “83% Americans.” Moreover, highlighting the physiological and psychological advantages to explaining the professional merits, these statistics serve as compelling evidence in support of the infographic's central premise. It is also interesting to note that the illustrated faces of individuals range in skin color as well as gender which suggests the commonality of this problem across a wide group of office workers. Therefore, empirical data combined with simple yet diverse characters appeal to multiple working adults in America.
Structurally, the infographic employs a logical question-answer format, adeptly anticipating and addressing potential concerns raised by the audience. Initially, the infographic highlights how “only 1/3rd if works use [humor] consistently”, prompting viewers to contemplate reasons behind this low statistics despite the benefit of “[making] you more productive, less stressed, & happier.” The text comes back to this data immediately in the next page, providing multiple misconceptions that people have about using humor in workplaces. Yet, these reasons reflect the fundamental concerns of workers, presenting this infographic as a piece that both accurately understands and guides the audience with effective solutions for their unhappiness. The second instance of this format occurs later in the infographic, where concerns regarding the acceptance and value of humor in the workplace are raised. To answer the rhetorical question of  “will others approve?” or if humor is “truly valuable in the workplace?” The writers utilize statistics to prompt counter such questions, utilizing compelling statistics like how  “97% of professionals” and “98% of CEOs” would approve, and 81% say it would make them more productive. By promptly addressing and resolving potential criticisms, the infographic mitigates skepticism and garners greater support for its advocacy of workplace humor. Since the hypophora and various statistics reflect the mindsets of many American office workers but ultimately states it as a common misconception, this in turn prompts many readers to start implementing humor more.
In conclusion, while the infographic effectively promotes the integration of humor in the workplace to foster a more enjoyable professional environment, its proposed solution may be perceived as a superficial remedy that fails to address underlying systemic issues. Although humor has the potential to infuse workplaces with vibrancy and levity, it does not address the root causes of dissatisfaction and unhappiness among American office workers. Issues such as overwork, burnout, and inadequate compensation persist despite the infusion of humor. Thus, while the infographic offers a well-intentioned solution, it ultimately serves as a band-aid rather than a comprehensive remedy for the broader challenges concerning the mental health and financial well-being of workers in America. Moving forward, a more holistic approach that addresses these systemic issues is imperative to cultivate truly fulfilling and sustainable workplaces.
Text B